Chat with us, powered by LiveChat MHA FPX 5020 CU Enhancing Telemedicine Adoption Capstone - Uni Pal


Write a data review project report and record a client presentation. There are no page or slide limits for this assessment.Introduction
Note: Each assessment of your capstone project is built on the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.Health care leaders are responsible for identifying relevant problems, analyzing data, drawing sound conclusions, and making recommendations for resolution of the problem in the workplace. The data review project that you will be completing in this assessment has provided you with the opportunity to practice the skills of a health care leader in a professional, real-world setting.In this assessment, you will write your final report and develop a presentation suitable for executive leaders.Overview and Preparation
In this assessment you will submit your project report and presentation, which are based on the work you have completed in the previous assessments.This assessment is in two parts:

Part 1: Project Report.  

This report should be succinct, substantive, and written for a hypothetical executive leadership team. It is not a lengthy academic paper.

Part 2: Project Report Presentation.

This recorded presentation is an overview of the project, also intended for an executive leadership team.

Presentation Tools
You may use Kaltura or another technology of your choice for your audio recording. Refer to the Using Kaltura tutorial for directions on recording and uploading your video in the courseroom.Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact to request accommodations.Templates
Download the following templates to use to complete this assessment:
Assessment 4 Final Project Report Template [DOCX].
Assessment 4 Presentation Template [PPTX].
Part 1: Project Report
Develop your data review project report. Use the Assessment 4 Final Project Report Template [DOCX]. Authoritative sources should be integrated into the Evidence-Based Recommendations and Conclusion sections of the report.Provide a minimum of two graphics (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, or process map), two evidence-based recommendations from the literature, and one new insight. Place these additions in your document under the headings Analysis of the Data, Evidence-Based Recommendations, and Conclusion, respectively.The requirements outlined below correspond to the first four grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your project report addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the assessment scoring guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
Analyze performance data and trends. 

Present your graphics, along with a concise analysis.
Describe the significant findings, trends, and any new insights evident from the graphics.
Determine whether there are any limitations to your findings, obstacles to collection or interpretation of data, or potential for bias.
Ensure your data is valid and reliable.

Provide evidence-based recommendations. 

Identify a short list of interventions to solve the problem, supported by current (published within the past 3–5 years) authoritative literature.
Consider adding additional best practice sources to your initial review of the current literature.
Consider how legal, regulatory, ethical, patient safety, and organizational factors are related to the problem.
Make realistic recommendations that are within the organization’s capability. They should not be based upon uncertain funding sources such as government grants, which might be discontinued.
Make your recommendations sufficiently compelling to convince the target audience to implement them.

Provide a conclusion for problem resolution and organizational transformation. 

Summarize the problem and method used for analysis.
Explain the key findings and their relevance to the problem.
Explain how your recommendations have the potential to transform the organization (for example, enhancing patient safety, containing costs, launching a new service line, et cetera.)

Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature. 

Apply correct APA formatting to your source citations.
Consider how or why a particular piece of evidence supports your main points, claims, or conclusions.
Make sure your supporting evidence is clear and explicit.

Provide a concise overview of your project in a recorded slide presentation. Use the Assessment 4 Presentation Template [PPTX].The requirements outlined below correspond to the fifth grading criterion in the scoring guide. Be sure your presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the assessment scoring guide to better understand how the following criterion will be assessed.
Present a concise, substantive project overview to decision makers.[Capstone Project Title]*
MHA-FP5020 Health Administration Capstone Course – Capella University
(Learner Name)
Submitted to:
(Instructor Name)
*Tip: Title – Use upper and lower case letters; state the specific problem to be examined.
Example: The Impact of Avoidable Readmission Wound Care Program at Organization X, Year
Executive Summary
Background Review of Literature
Data Analysis Framework
Presentation of the Graphics
[Graphic Data Summary #1]
[Graphic Data Summary #2]
[Optional Graphic Data Summary…. X]
Analysis of the Data
Evidence-Based Recommendations
*Tip: Table of Contents – Include all headings, subheadings, a list of figures and/or tables with
specific and clear titles, and reference list, and be sure to update and right-justify page numbers.
Required elements: Problem statement, factors and units of measurement, method for examining
data, purpose/relevance of the data examination, and nature of the findings.
Hospital Acquired Infections (HAI) compromise patient safety, lower patient satisfaction, and
may adversely affect provider quality ratings and provider reimbursement (source, year). This
study will examine the relative weight of HAI contributing factors a, b and c via percentage
variance from baseline X within organization Y during time period Z. The findings from this data
review may serve as insights for comparative analysis benchmarking, quality improvement, and
future reduction of HAIs.
Tip: Executive Summary – One page maximum, double spaced. Include the problem statement,
rationale/purpose/value for the analysis, statement of the method/approach (cost benefit
analysis? Compliance audit? Other?). Also include the key factors or performance indicators
that directly relate to the problem, how each factor is measured, and the goal for the data
analysis (e.g. to discover new insights into problem x for quality improvement purposes/other).
The executive summary needs to clearly state how the project adds value to the organization.
Note that the problem statement must be presented in this form: Condition X may result in
adverse consequence(s) Y.
Critical Success Factor: Body – use outline format with in-text citations for all statements
presented as facts. Please do not use lengthy paragraphs.
Statement of the Problem
Required format: [Condition X leads to adverse consequence(s) a, b and c. Source, year).]
Key Factors that Directly Influence the Problem [aka Performance Indicators]
Required format: A one-sentence statement indicating what factors directly relate to the
problem, and from what source(s) this information was obtained. Include a citation.
Required format: Use a table format to clearly identify factors and their associated units of
Factor Which Directly
Relates to the Problem
Precise Unit of
Authoritative Source(s) for
Factor and Unit of
(Days, Dollars, %, etc.)
Example: Sepsis
% of Hospital Acquired
Infections during 1 year
The Joint Commission
Value Proposition to the Organization
Required format: One sentence which explains the value or benefit of the project to the
Example: This data analysis of HAIs/sepsis will provide a baseline for insights into future quality
Value Proposition/Contribution to My Professional Interests/Goals
Required format: One sentence which explains the value or benefit of the project to your
professional interests/ career goals.
Tip: Transfer the information from your Assessment 2 Proposal. You can make changes to
improve your final product, but your instructor will not re-grade this section.
Required Format: Complete the table with a minimum of six current authoritative sources. A
minimum of one source needs to substantiate the presence of the problem, one source needs to
contain factors and units of measurement (e.g. data sets) which directly relate to the problem,
and one source needs to address regulatory/legal/ethical or other industry professional
Authoritative Source
(APA Format)
How the Source Directly Relates to the Problem
(One Sentence Summary)
Required Format: Cite the authoritative source(s) which supports the selected data analysis
framework or method.
Required Format: A maximum of three to five sentences which explain how/why the data
illustrate the problem.
[Graphic #1]
Graphic Title= Factor Examined, Organization Name or Region, Year
[Graphic #2]
Graphic Title= Factor Examined, Organization Name or Region, Year
[Optional Graphic #3…. X]
Graphic Title= Factor Examined, Organization Name or Region, Year
Required: Include performance indicators and numeric measures of the potential impact of the
data review project.
Organization’s Directional Strategy: (Growth, Reduction, Quality leader, etc.)
Key Performance
Indicator and Metric
Increase patient
satisfaction rating
from 6 to 8 within six
Tip: Transfer the information for the sections above from your Assessment 2 Proposal. You
should make the changes upon which you and your client agreed, but faculty will not re-grade
the sections above.
Required format: In a succinct, substantive manner, summarize what is relevant about each of
the graphic data summaries you presented. Include one new insight for each graphic. Avoid
lengthy paragraphs and use outline format.
[Graphic #1: Title, axes labeled, one to three sentences about importance of findings]
[Graphic #2: Title, axes labeled, one to three sentences about importance of findings]
[Optional Graphic #3: Title, axes labeled, one to three sentences about importance of findings]
Required Format: Include a minimum of two different current peer-reviewed/authoritative
sources that address or solve the problem.
Provide a minimum of two evidence-based recommendations supported by current (within the
past 3–5 years) authoritative literature. Your recommendations should be realistic, within the
organization’s capability, and should not be based upon uncertain funding sources, such as
government grants, which might be discontinued.
Tip: Be sure to include your insights, any solutions or recommendations from your interview
with the expert/practicing health care professional, or any personal solutions that you would
recommend for the future. Include APA formatted in-text citations and a Reference list at the end
of this document. Note: For-profit online news services and .com websites are not authoritative
sources appropriate for master’s-degree level scholarly work.
Required format: One- to three-sentence transition or introductory comments. Then, describe the
problem, method, and key findings.
Tip: Include industry standards, legal/regulatory considerations, ethical considerations, reasons
to continue to explore/solve the problem, possible implications for future study, possible future
innovations, et cetera.
Required format: Use APA format. Submit a draft of your report to SafeAssign. Open the report,
and determine whether any citations need to be revised, added, et cetera. Make necessary
revisions before submitting a second time to SafeAssign, and after second review, submit your
assessment. Include the SafeAssign match percentage in the message box of your assessment
submission page.
*Tip: List relevant, credible, peer-reviewed sources in correct APA format. All links for web
resources must be active (working). Wikipedia and secondary source literature are not
acceptable for this report. Avoid .com websites; avoid sources over five years old whenever
possible; assure that your URLs are correct; avoid URLs that are not accessible without a
subscription; avoid URLs that lead to a main directory page rather than the specific information
that is being cited.
Data Review Project Report
Title of Project
Capella University MHA-FP5020
Learner Name
Instructor Name
Title of Project
• Statement of the Problem.
• Factors Examined and Units of Measurement.
• Summary of Literature Key Findings.
• Presentation of Data.
• Analysis of Data.
• Evidence-Based Recommendations.
• Conclusion.
• References.
Statement of the Problem
Factors Examined and Units of Measurement
Summary of Literature: Key Findings
Presentation of Data (Graphic #1)
Presentation of Data (Graphic #2)
Analysis of Data
Evidence-Based Recommendations

Purchase answer to see full

error: Content is protected !!