Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Trident DOC690 2022 November Module 5 Case & Slp Latest - Uni Pal

DOC690 Doctoral Study Proposal

Module 5 Case

DSP RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION AND APPROVAL FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE

Case Assignment

In Module 5 Case you will receive your peer-review feedback from a fellow student concerning your DSP Prospectus / Proposal. Upon receipt of the peer-review, conduct a review of the comments and address any pertinent comments or observations that will add to the overall quality and readability of your intended DSP Proposal. Not all comments may be addressed depending on the quality and appropriateness of the comments themselves, however each student should be prepared to defend their own rationale for incorporating or not addressing the editing comments in their own revised proposal. Comments addressing the peer-review comments and how they were addressed within the revised DSP Proposal should be contained in the following “change matrix” formatted templated provided below for submission of this assignment:

Title of DSP:

DBA Candidate:

Date:

Reviewer’s recommendation      How addressed Page numbers in

DSP where change

appears

Example

A1. The author must clarify their research questions to align with their research problem.              Example

RQs have been reworded to more clearly identify the two variables being compared: the dependent variable which is the ratio of (a) cash flows from operating activities to (b) earnings from continuing operations, compared when the independent variable, fraud, is yes or no. The two constructs that make up the dependent variable are well known in accounting and finance literature and are not defined here.         p. 12

Assignment Expectations

Your assignment will be graded using the following criteria:

Assignment-driven Criteria: Student demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment

Critical Thinking/Application to Professional Practice: Student demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and analyzing information. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice in an exceptional manner.

Business Writing and Quality of References: Student demonstrates mastery and proficiency in written communication and use of appropriate and relevant literature at the doctoral level.

Citing Sources: Student demonstrates mastery applying APA formatting standards to both in text citations and the reference list.

Professionalism and Timeliness: Assignments are submitted on time.

 

DOC690 Doctoral Study Proposal

Module 5 SLP

DSP RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION AND APPROVAL FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE

In Module 5 SLP you will submit your edited and completed DSP Prospectus (Chapters 1-3). Students should also upload their final DSP Prospectus draft within the prescribed DOC800 Dropbox which will be properly archived for use by you and your DSP Chair for final review and preparation of your DSP Proposal Defense upon completion of this course. You should incorporate the necessary edits and reviews contained within this course in order to strengthen your final DSP Proposal draft for your eventual Proposal defense.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Length: The written component of this assignment should contain the completed DSP Prospectus with the necessary edits contained within the peer-review process.

Organization: Topics and chapter section slides should adhere to the DSP Proposal Template.

Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. We encourage you to use tools such as grammarly.com and proofread your paper before submission.

As you complete your assignment, make sure you do the following:

Stay focused on the precise DSP Proposal Template sections. Do not go off on tangents or devote a lot of space to summarizing general background materials.

Use evidence from your literature review to justify your proposal.

Cite at least 10-15 credible resources.

Your assignment will be graded using the following criteria:

Assignment-driven Criteria: Student demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment

Critical Thinking/Application to Professional Practice: Student demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and analyzing information. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice in an exceptional manner.

Business Writing and Quality of References: Student demonstrates mastery and proficiency in written communication and use of appropriate and relevant literature at the doctoral level.

Citing Sources: Student demonstrates mastery applying APA formatting standards to both in text citations and the reference list.

Professionalism and Timeliness: Assignments are submitted on time.

error: Content is protected !!